|
|
|
RUSLE2 has evolved from a
series of previous erosion prediction technologies. The USLE was entirely an empirically based
equation and was limited in its application to conditions where experimental
data were available for deriving factor values.
|
|
A major advancement in
RUSLE1 was the use of subfactor relationships to compute C factor values from
basis features of cover-management systems, which allowed RUSLE2 to be
applied tofar more conditions than the USLE.
While RUSLE1 retained the basic structure of the USLE, process-based
relationships were added where empirical data and relationships were
inadequate, such as computing the effect of strip cropping for modern
conservation tillage systems.
|
|
RUSLE2 is another major
advancement over RUSLE2. While RUSLE2
uses the USLE basic formulation of the unit plot, the mathematics of RUSLE2
are on a daily basis. Subfactor relationships
are also used in RUSLE2 but these relationships have been improved from
RUSLE1, a new ridge subfactor has been added, and the deposition equations
have been extended to consider sediment characteristics and how deposition
changes these characteristics. It
includes new relationships for handling residue, including resurfacing of
residue by implements like field cultivators.
|
|
The major change visible
change in RUSLE2 is its new, modern graphical user interface that is easy to
use, but is extremely powerful in the information that it displays and the
types of situations that it can represent.
RUSLE2 is a vary powerful model yet it uses very simple, easy to
obtain inputs.
|
|
RUSLE2 computes both
temporal and spatially variable effects such as the effect of soil and
management varying along a hillslope.
|
|
The RUSLE2 developers claim
that it is the best available technology for conservation planning at the
local field office level. Its science
is totally modern and is just as process-based as any other model and includes
new science not available in any other model.
|
|
RUSLE2 brings together of
the empirically based models like the USLE/RUSLE1 and the process based
models like WEPP.
|
|
RUSLE2 does not compute
ephemeral gully erosion at present, but capability is being planned for
RUSLE2. RUSLE2 will be the erosion
prediction tool of choice for the next several years.
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|